R1200RS + R1250RS Forum
Print view
Wed Sep 05, 2018 11:40 pm (Last edited: Wed Sep 05, 2018 11:46 pm)
|
While at a BMW shop that I had never been to before, I picked up a BMW brochure from a pile in the customer waiting area. I was going to post pictures of some interesting pages in the brochure that comment on the pros and cons of other brand's models that compete with the new F750GS/F850GS. Just as I was going to make the post, I noticed a small note at the upper left hand corner of the front of the brochure that says: "for internal use only, not for distribution". Well, I guess I wasn't the only person who didn't read that note as there were several copies of this brochure in the lounge area. So should I or shouldn't I? That is the question.
Richard230
has attached images to this post
No rights to view attachments. Only file names are shown. Register now! 010.JPG
010.JPG
Current motorcycle collection: 2002 Yamaha FZ1; 2005 Triumph Bonneville T-100; 2011 Royal Enfield Bullet 500; 2009 BMW F650GS; 2016 BMW R1200RS; 2011 Zero S 16.6 kWh |
|
reply
|
|
Zitat von Richard230 im Beitrag #1 Since the information was obtained legally, you can also pass on the content (or the brochure). In how far the publishing of images represents a violation of copyright, I can not say exactly. But if, as usual with other publications, we give the source properly, I think we can publish it here.
Regards,
Holger Moderator and Admin |
|
I will do that now in a new thread. There is nothing that I will post that could be considered privileged or propitiatory information, just BMW's opinion of similar motorcycle models from other brands.
Current motorcycle collection: 2002 Yamaha FZ1; 2005 Triumph Bonneville T-100; 2011 Royal Enfield Bullet 500; 2009 BMW F650GS; 2016 BMW R1200RS; 2011 Zero S 16.6 kWh
|
|
